Last Updated: 10/10/2026 14:14 [UTC]

Tinkaton

Tier E

OU (Over Used)

1.85%Usage Rate
49.05%Win Rate
30.74%Lead Rate
1270Avg Rating

5537 recorded team appearances · 2716 wins · 2821 losses · 09/26/2026–10/10/2026

Recorded Move Team Uses

Top 10 moves with 10+ recorded team uses

Stealth Rock Recorded use in 2090 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (37.7%) 1120 winning team uses of 2090 recorded team uses
53.6%
Gigaton Hammer Recorded use in 2053 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (37.1%) 1075 winning team uses of 2053 recorded team uses
52.4%
Thunder Wave Recorded use in 1339 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (24.2%) 693 winning team uses of 1339 recorded team uses
51.8%
Encore Recorded use in 1145 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (20.7%) 637 winning team uses of 1145 recorded team uses
55.6%
Knock Off Recorded use in 768 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (13.9%) 354 winning team uses of 768 recorded team uses
46.1%
Play Rough Recorded use in 381 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (6.9%) 159 winning team uses of 381 recorded team uses
41.7%
Fake Out Recorded use in 227 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (4.1%) 108 winning team uses of 227 recorded team uses
47.6%
Ice Hammer Recorded use in 185 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (3.3%) 103 winning team uses of 185 recorded team uses
55.7%
Swords Dance Recorded use in 185 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (3.3%) 78 winning team uses of 185 recorded team uses
42.2%
Endeavor Recorded use in 99 of 5537 distinct recorded team appearances (1.8%) 54 winning team uses of 99 recorded team uses
54.5%

Team win rate among recorded uses · bars centered at 50%

⚠️ Important Note:

  • This data shows moves actually recorded as used in battles, not move adoption rates in team building.
  • Each side counts once per battle for this Pokémon and move, even after repeated uses or duplicate saved records. Both teams in a mirror battle count separately.
  • The use proportion divides recorded team uses by this Pokémon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same period, format, rating and OTS filters. Win rate divides winning team uses by recorded team uses.
  • Unused moves, unselected Pokémon and missing or misattributed move records limit comparisons. Name and form resolution may omit or mix move records. No records do not imply a 0% win rate.
  • These team outcomes do not show that a move increases the chance of winning.
  • For moveset adoption rates, refer to Smogon Stats.

Usage Trend

Win Rate Trend

Usage by rating

Win rate by rating

Chart data
Trends
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST 2.30 48.57 74642 1719 Observed
Period 2: 2026/09/30 15:46–2026/10/03 23:49 JST 1.84 49.89 74642 1373 Observed
Period 3: 2026/10/03 23:49–2026/10/07 09:55 JST 1.58 50.89 74640 1177 Observed
Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST 1.70 47.08 74640 1268 Observed
Rating bands
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
~R1084 1.65 47.02 60200 991 Observed
~R1156 1.66 48.33 59416 987 Observed
~R1268 1.66 49.64 59484 985 Observed
~R1398 1.88 52.13 59960 1126 Observed
R1398~ 2.43 48.14 59504 1448 Observed

Tinkaton Observed Statistics

Performance Metrics

Tinkaton has a reported usage rate of 1.85% and win rate of 49.05% in OU (Over Used) (displayed tier: E). The report covers 09/26/2026 to 10/10/2026, with 149,282 recorded battles. 2,716 wins and 2,821 losses (5,537 recorded team appearances). Usage is recorded team appearances divided by twice the report battle count; win rate is wins divided by wins plus losses for teams containing this Pokemon. Neither metric measures individual strength. Small samples can produce extreme percentages.

Usage Trends

Usage was 2.30% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=74,642 team slots) and 1.70% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST; n=74,640 team slots), a change of -0.60 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded. Win rate was 48.57% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=1,719 recorded appearances) and 47.08% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST; n=1,268 recorded appearances), a change of -1.49 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded.

Rating-band Observations

Across 5 available rating bands, usage ranged from 1.65% (~R1084; n=60,200 team slots) to 2.43% (R1398~; n=59,504 team slots), a spread of 0.78 percentage points. Overall usage was 1.85%. Bands use battle-average ratings, not individual player skill. Missing bands are excluded; differences are descriptive, not evidence of statistical significance.

Recorded Moves

Among the returned moves, Stealth Rock has the largest recorded team-use count (2,090; ties may occur). Move counts refer to distinct team appearances with a recorded use by this Pokemon, counting each side once per battle. The displayed percentage divides that count by this Pokemon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same report filters. Both sides of a mirror battle count separately. This is not moveset adoption. Unused moves and missing move records cannot be distinguished here. These data do not establish which move is strongest or underused.

Teammate Observations

In the returned frequent-teammate sample: Great Tusk: 54.0% wins in 1,632 recorded pair observations; Gliscor: 49.7% wins in 1,204 recorded pair observations; Ting-Lu: 53.6% wins in 1,028 recorded pair observations. These are team-level outcomes with both Pokemon on the roster, not a measurement of synergy. Other teammates, player selection and small samples can affect these percentages.

Opponent-team Observations

Returned higher-win-rate opponent group: Pelipper: 55.5% wins in 254 recorded pair observations; Greninja-*: 55.2% wins in 145 recorded pair observations; Weavile: 54.8% wins in 146 recorded pair observations. Returned lower-win-rate opponent group: Meowscarada: 41.7% wins in 240 recorded pair observations; Iron Crown: 42.6% wins in 211 recorded pair observations; Great Tusk: 43.0% wins in 1,495 recorded pair observations. Wins refer to the team containing the focal Pokemon when the named Pokemon was on the opposing roster. They are not direct one-on-one results or proof of a counter; sample sizes and other team members matter.

Interpretation Limits

These summaries describe the collected battles within the report period. Team composition, player selection, repeated players and incomplete records can affect results. Differences do not establish causation, statistical significance or a recommended build.

The groups below summarize recorded team outcomes. Partner and opponent win rates do not measure synergy or direct one-on-one matchups. Small samples and other team members can affect results.

Frequent Partners

Most common teammates · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk1632 recorded pair observations · 1.09 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.0%
Gliscor
Gliscor1204 recorded pair observations · 0.81 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.7%
Ting-Lu
Ting-Lu1028 recorded pair observations · 0.69 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.6%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui976 recorded pair observations · 0.65 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.7%
Dragonite
Dragonite882 recorded pair observations · 0.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.7%
Sinistcha
Sinistcha878 recorded pair observations · 0.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.7%
Dragapult
Dragapult821 recorded pair observations · 0.55 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.5%
Hydrapple
Hydrapple715 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.5%
Pecharunt
Pecharunt677 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.8%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar609 recorded pair observations · 0.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.1%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*591 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Moltres
Moltres578 recorded pair observations · 0.39 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.1%
Alomomola
Alomomola544 recorded pair observations · 0.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.5%
Garganacl
Garganacl531 recorded pair observations · 0.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%
Ogerpon
Ogerpon524 recorded pair observations · 0.35 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.2%
Zapdos
Zapdos498 recorded pair observations · 0.33 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.6%
Hydreigon
Hydreigon427 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.0%
Keldeo
Keldeo381 recorded pair observations · 0.26 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.0%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo367 recorded pair observations · 0.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.7%
Keldeo-Resolute
Keldeo-Resolute367 recorded pair observations · 0.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.4%

Frequent Matchups

Most common opponents · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk1495 recorded pair observations · 1.00 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.0%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo1134 recorded pair observations · 0.76 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.2%
Kingambit
Kingambit1086 recorded pair observations · 0.73 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.0%
Dragonite
Dragonite866 recorded pair observations · 0.58 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.5%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring827 recorded pair observations · 0.55 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.4%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*796 recorded pair observations · 0.53 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.1%
Dragapult
Dragapult763 recorded pair observations · 0.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.9%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant762 recorded pair observations · 0.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Gliscor
Gliscor744 recorded pair observations · 0.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.7%
Corviknight
Corviknight720 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.9%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt671 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.0%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar669 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.2%
Cinderace
Cinderace629 recorded pair observations · 0.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.6%
Hatterene
Hatterene598 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.5%
Kyurem
Kyurem556 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.1%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui551 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.5%
Alomomola
Alomomola550 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.3%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian550 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.8%
Ting-Lu
Ting-Lu527 recorded pair observations · 0.35 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.7%
Darkrai
Darkrai511 recorded pair observations · 0.34 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.8%

Higher Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Ogerpon
Ogerpon524 recorded pair observations · 0.35 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.2%
Hydreigon
Hydreigon427 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.0%
Pecharunt
Pecharunt677 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.8%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring354 recorded pair observations · 0.24 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.5%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt303 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.4%
Alomomola
Alomomola544 recorded pair observations · 0.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.5%
Sinistcha
Sinistcha878 recorded pair observations · 0.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.7%
Latios
Latios167 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.5%
Walking Wake
Walking Wake173 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.3%
Great Tusk
Great Tusk1632 recorded pair observations · 1.09 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.0%

Lower Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Weezing-Galar
Weezing-Galar149 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
38.9%
Quaquaval
Quaquaval287 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
39.0%
Kingambit
Kingambit170 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
40.6%
Ceruledge
Ceruledge347 recorded pair observations · 0.23 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.2%
Lokix
Lokix166 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.6%
Zoroark-Hisui
Zoroark-Hisui226 recorded pair observations · 0.15 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Pelipper
Pelipper306 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.4%
Skeledirge
Skeledirge155 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.2%
Meowscarada
Meowscarada313 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.7%
Mimikyu
Mimikyu292 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.9%

Higher Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Pelipper
Pelipper254 recorded pair observations · 0.17 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.5%
Greninja-*
Greninja-*145 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.2%
Weavile
Weavile146 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.8%
Tyranitar
Tyranitar189 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.5%
Garchomp
Garchomp311 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.3%
Clefable
Clefable298 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.4%
Rillaboom
Rillaboom435 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.3%
Clodsire
Clodsire185 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.0%
Garganacl
Garganacl309 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.8%
Hawlucha
Hawlucha149 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.4%

Lower Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Meowscarada
Meowscarada240 recorded pair observations · 0.16 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.7%
Iron Crown
Iron Crown211 recorded pair observations · 0.14 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
42.6%
Great Tusk
Great Tusk1495 recorded pair observations · 1.00 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.0%
Dondozo
Dondozo228 recorded pair observations · 0.15 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.4%
Heatran
Heatran198 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.9%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant762 recorded pair observations · 0.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Ogerpon
Ogerpon217 recorded pair observations · 0.15 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Zapdos
Zapdos390 recorded pair observations · 0.26 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.4%
Lokix
Lokix175 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.6%
Cresselia
Cresselia154 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.8%