Last Updated: 10/10/2026 14:13 [UTC]

Iron Treads

Tier B

OU (Over Used)

9.07%Usage Rate
53.30%Win Rate
21.24%Lead Rate
1293Avg Rating

27066 recorded team appearances · 14426 wins · 12640 losses · 09/26/2026–10/10/2026

Recorded Move Team Uses

Top 10 moves with 10+ recorded team uses

Stealth Rock Recorded use in 8833 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (32.6%) 4807 winning team uses of 8833 recorded team uses
54.4%
Earthquake Recorded use in 8704 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (32.2%) 4818 winning team uses of 8704 recorded team uses
55.4%
Rapid Spin Recorded use in 7148 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (26.4%) 3875 winning team uses of 7148 recorded team uses
54.2%
Knock Off Recorded use in 4419 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (16.3%) 2377 winning team uses of 4419 recorded team uses
53.8%
Ice Spinner Recorded use in 3033 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (11.2%) 1643 winning team uses of 3033 recorded team uses
54.2%
Volt Switch Recorded use in 1538 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (5.7%) 817 winning team uses of 1538 recorded team uses
53.1%
Iron Head Recorded use in 1009 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (3.7%) 514 winning team uses of 1009 recorded team uses
50.9%
Earth Power Recorded use in 714 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (2.6%) 404 winning team uses of 714 recorded team uses
56.6%
Steel Beam Recorded use in 676 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (2.5%) 390 winning team uses of 676 recorded team uses
57.7%
High Horsepower Recorded use in 355 of 27066 distinct recorded team appearances (1.3%) 187 winning team uses of 355 recorded team uses
52.7%

Team win rate among recorded uses · bars centered at 50%

⚠️ Important Note:

  • This data shows moves actually recorded as used in battles, not move adoption rates in team building.
  • Each side counts once per battle for this Pokémon and move, even after repeated uses or duplicate saved records. Both teams in a mirror battle count separately.
  • The use proportion divides recorded team uses by this Pokémon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same period, format, rating and OTS filters. Win rate divides winning team uses by recorded team uses.
  • Unused moves, unselected Pokémon and missing or misattributed move records limit comparisons. Name and form resolution may omit or mix move records. No records do not imply a 0% win rate.
  • These team outcomes do not show that a move increases the chance of winning.
  • For moveset adoption rates, refer to Smogon Stats.

Usage Trend

Win Rate Trend

Usage by rating

Win rate by rating

Chart data
Trends
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST 8.16 53.01 74640 6087 Observed
Period 2: 2026/09/30 15:45–2026/10/03 23:48 JST 8.75 52.68 74640 6530 Observed
Period 3: 2026/10/03 23:48–2026/10/07 09:55 JST 9.41 53.14 74640 7023 Observed
Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST 9.95 54.23 74640 7426 Observed
Rating bands
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
~R1084 5.17 63.02 60196 3115 Observed
~R1156 7.69 56.24 59416 4570 Observed
~R1268 9.50 51.12 59484 5650 Observed
~R1398 10.88 50.38 59960 6521 Observed
R1398~ 12.12 51.60 59504 7210 Observed

Iron Treads Observed Statistics

Performance Metrics

Iron Treads has a reported usage rate of 9.07% and win rate of 53.30% in OU (Over Used) (displayed tier: B). The report covers 09/26/2026 to 10/10/2026, with 149,280 recorded battles. 14,426 wins and 12,640 losses (27,066 recorded team appearances). Usage is recorded team appearances divided by twice the report battle count; win rate is wins divided by wins plus losses for teams containing this Pokemon. Neither metric measures individual strength. Small samples can produce extreme percentages.

Usage Trends

Usage was 8.16% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=74,640 team slots) and 9.95% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST; n=74,640 team slots), a change of +1.79 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded. Win rate was 53.01% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=6,087 recorded appearances) and 54.23% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST; n=7,426 recorded appearances), a change of +1.22 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded.

Rating-band Observations

Across 5 available rating bands, usage ranged from 5.17% (~R1084; n=60,196 team slots) to 12.12% (R1398~; n=59,504 team slots), a spread of 6.95 percentage points. Overall usage was 9.07%. Bands use battle-average ratings, not individual player skill. Missing bands are excluded; differences are descriptive, not evidence of statistical significance.

Recorded Moves

Among the returned moves, Stealth Rock has the largest recorded team-use count (8,833; ties may occur). Move counts refer to distinct team appearances with a recorded use by this Pokemon, counting each side once per battle. The displayed percentage divides that count by this Pokemon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same report filters. Both sides of a mirror battle count separately. This is not moveset adoption. Unused moves and missing move records cannot be distinguished here. These data do not establish which move is strongest or underused.

Teammate Observations

In the returned frequent-teammate sample: Zamazenta-*: 55.7% wins in 6,588 recorded pair observations; Raging Bolt: 55.5% wins in 5,653 recorded pair observations; Iron Valiant: 53.3% wins in 5,250 recorded pair observations. These are team-level outcomes with both Pokemon on the roster, not a measurement of synergy. Other teammates, player selection and small samples can affect these percentages.

Opponent-team Observations

Returned higher-win-rate opponent group: Milotic: 67.3% wins in 278 recorded pair observations; Espeon: 62.1% wins in 301 recorded pair observations; Gengar: 61.1% wins in 450 recorded pair observations. Returned lower-win-rate opponent group: Cresselia: 45.1% wins in 765 recorded pair observations; Volcanion: 46.4% wins in 541 recorded pair observations; Manaphy: 46.5% wins in 299 recorded pair observations. Wins refer to the team containing the focal Pokemon when the named Pokemon was on the opposing roster. They are not direct one-on-one results or proof of a counter; sample sizes and other team members matter.

Interpretation Limits

These summaries describe the collected battles within the report period. Team composition, player selection, repeated players and incomplete records can affect results. Differences do not establish causation, statistical significance or a recommended build.

The groups below summarize recorded team outcomes. Partner and opponent win rates do not measure synergy or direct one-on-one matchups. Small samples and other team members can affect results.

Frequent Partners

Most common teammates · bars centered at 50%

Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*6588 recorded pair observations · 4.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.7%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt5653 recorded pair observations · 3.79 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.5%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant5250 recorded pair observations · 3.52 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.3%
Kingambit
Kingambit5234 recorded pair observations · 3.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.1%
Pelipper
Pelipper4493 recorded pair observations · 3.01 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.1%
Dragonite
Dragonite4296 recorded pair observations · 2.88 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Alomomola
Alomomola4191 recorded pair observations · 2.81 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.6%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring3944 recorded pair observations · 2.64 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.9%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo3916 recorded pair observations · 2.62 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.1%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui3870 recorded pair observations · 2.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.9%
Dragapult
Dragapult3686 recorded pair observations · 2.47 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.2%
Kyurem
Kyurem3579 recorded pair observations · 2.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.6%
Pecharunt
Pecharunt3319 recorded pair observations · 2.22 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.6%
Barraskewda
Barraskewda2929 recorded pair observations · 1.96 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.2%
Zapdos
Zapdos2866 recorded pair observations · 1.92 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.0%
Moltres
Moltres2658 recorded pair observations · 1.78 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.0%
Tornadus-Therian
Tornadus-Therian2491 recorded pair observations · 1.67 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.2%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar2237 recorded pair observations · 1.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.5%
Rillaboom
Rillaboom2233 recorded pair observations · 1.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.5%
Lokix
Lokix2217 recorded pair observations · 1.49 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.0%

Frequent Matchups

Most common opponents · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk7652 recorded pair observations · 5.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.4%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo5765 recorded pair observations · 3.86 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.7%
Kingambit
Kingambit5498 recorded pair observations · 3.68 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.8%
Dragonite
Dragonite4030 recorded pair observations · 2.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.4%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*4006 recorded pair observations · 2.68 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring3931 recorded pair observations · 2.63 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.4%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant3672 recorded pair observations · 2.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.1%
Dragapult
Dragapult3671 recorded pair observations · 2.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.7%
Gliscor
Gliscor3585 recorded pair observations · 2.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.7%
Corviknight
Corviknight3353 recorded pair observations · 2.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.4%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt3336 recorded pair observations · 2.23 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.1%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar3160 recorded pair observations · 2.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.7%
Hatterene
Hatterene3109 recorded pair observations · 2.08 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.0%
Cinderace
Cinderace2962 recorded pair observations · 1.98 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.3%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui2848 recorded pair observations · 1.91 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.9%
Alomomola
Alomomola2823 recorded pair observations · 1.89 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian2762 recorded pair observations · 1.85 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.0%
Iron Treads
Iron Treads2752 recorded pair observations · 1.84 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.0%
Kyurem
Kyurem2672 recorded pair observations · 1.79 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.6%
Glimmora
Glimmora2580 recorded pair observations · 1.73 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.9%

Higher Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Manaphy
Manaphy277 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.2%
Kingdra
Kingdra742 recorded pair observations · 0.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.9%
Cresselia
Cresselia400 recorded pair observations · 0.27 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.5%
Overqwil
Overqwil1148 recorded pair observations · 0.77 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.0%
Talonflame
Talonflame277 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.3%
Pelipper
Pelipper4493 recorded pair observations · 3.01 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.1%
Iron Boulder
Iron Boulder287 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.8%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*6588 recorded pair observations · 4.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.7%
Scizor
Scizor356 recorded pair observations · 0.24 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.6%
Ogerpon-Cornerstone
Ogerpon-Cornerstone434 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.5%

Lower Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Latios
Latios366 recorded pair observations · 0.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.5%
Grimmsnarl
Grimmsnarl465 recorded pair observations · 0.31 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.7%
Heatran
Heatran344 recorded pair observations · 0.23 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.7%
Toxapex
Toxapex579 recorded pair observations · 0.39 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.0%
Blissey
Blissey349 recorded pair observations · 0.23 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.1%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar2237 recorded pair observations · 1.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.5%
Gliscor
Gliscor1373 recorded pair observations · 0.92 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.9%
Quaquaval
Quaquaval395 recorded pair observations · 0.26 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.9%
Rotom-Wash
Rotom-Wash438 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.9%
Sinistcha
Sinistcha434 recorded pair observations · 0.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.5%

Higher Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Milotic
Milotic278 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
67.3%
Espeon
Espeon301 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
62.1%
Gengar
Gengar450 recorded pair observations · 0.30 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
61.1%
Arcanine-Hisui
Arcanine-Hisui372 recorded pair observations · 0.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
60.0%
Cloyster
Cloyster316 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.8%
Zoroark-Hisui
Zoroark-Hisui355 recorded pair observations · 0.24 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.1%
Regieleki
Regieleki349 recorded pair observations · 0.23 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.0%
Mimikyu
Mimikyu373 recorded pair observations · 0.25 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.9%
Rotom-Wash
Rotom-Wash660 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.4%
Serperior
Serperior625 recorded pair observations · 0.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.8%

Lower Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Cresselia
Cresselia765 recorded pair observations · 0.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.1%
Volcanion
Volcanion541 recorded pair observations · 0.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.4%
Manaphy
Manaphy299 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.5%
Keldeo-Resolute
Keldeo-Resolute299 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.8%
Hydrapple
Hydrapple662 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.2%
Slither Wing
Slither Wing442 recorded pair observations · 0.30 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.4%
Kyurem
Kyurem2672 recorded pair observations · 1.79 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.6%
Moltres-Galar
Moltres-Galar308 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.7%
Barraskewda
Barraskewda606 recorded pair observations · 0.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*4006 recorded pair observations · 2.68 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%