Last Updated: 10/10/2026 14:09 [UTC]

Kingambit

Tier B

OU (Over Used)

19.88%Usage Rate
52.63%Win Rate
2.07%Lead Rate
1255Avg Rating

59342 recorded team appearances · 31232 wins · 28110 losses · 09/26/2026–10/10/2026

Recorded Move Team Uses

Top 10 moves with 10+ recorded team uses

Sucker Punch Recorded use in 18726 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (31.6%) 8734 winning team uses of 18726 recorded team uses
46.6%
Kowtow Cleave Recorded use in 14187 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (23.9%) 7454 winning team uses of 14187 recorded team uses
52.5%
Swords Dance Recorded use in 12627 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (21.3%) 5724 winning team uses of 12627 recorded team uses
45.3%
Iron Head Recorded use in 10679 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (18.0%) 5650 winning team uses of 10679 recorded team uses
52.9%
Low Kick Recorded use in 3198 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (5.4%) 1750 winning team uses of 3198 recorded team uses
54.7%
Brick Break Recorded use in 332 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (0.6%) 140 winning team uses of 332 recorded team uses
42.2%
Protect Recorded use in 216 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (0.4%) 77 winning team uses of 216 recorded team uses
35.6%
Zen Headbutt Recorded use in 161 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (0.3%) 73 winning team uses of 161 recorded team uses
45.3%
Poison Jab Recorded use in 123 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (0.2%) 52 winning team uses of 123 recorded team uses
42.3%
Stone Edge Recorded use in 116 of 59343 distinct recorded team appearances (0.2%) 39 winning team uses of 116 recorded team uses
33.6%

Team win rate among recorded uses · bars centered at 50%

⚠️ Important Note:

  • This data shows moves actually recorded as used in battles, not move adoption rates in team building.
  • Each side counts once per battle for this Pokémon and move, even after repeated uses or duplicate saved records. Both teams in a mirror battle count separately.
  • The use proportion divides recorded team uses by this Pokémon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same period, format, rating and OTS filters. Win rate divides winning team uses by recorded team uses.
  • Unused moves, unselected Pokémon and missing or misattributed move records limit comparisons. Name and form resolution may omit or mix move records. No records do not imply a 0% win rate.
  • These team outcomes do not show that a move increases the chance of winning.
  • For moveset adoption rates, refer to Smogon Stats.

Usage Trend

Win Rate Trend

Usage by rating

Win rate by rating

Chart data
Trends
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST 19.34 52.33 74640 14432 Observed
Period 2: 2026/09/30 15:45–2026/10/03 23:48 JST 20.25 53.20 74640 15116 Observed
Period 3: 2026/10/03 23:48–2026/10/07 09:55 JST 19.75 52.38 74640 14739 Observed
Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST 20.17 52.59 74640 15055 Observed
Rating bands
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
~R1084 17.45 55.91 60196 10506 Observed
~R1156 19.83 52.86 59416 11781 Observed
~R1268 21.45 51.82 59484 12758 Observed
~R1398 19.92 51.12 59960 11943 Observed
R1398~ 20.76 51.92 59504 12354 Observed

Kingambit Observed Statistics

Performance Metrics

Kingambit has a reported usage rate of 19.88% and win rate of 52.63% in OU (Over Used) (displayed tier: B). The report covers 09/26/2026 to 10/10/2026, with 149,280 recorded battles. 31,232 wins and 28,110 losses (59,342 recorded team appearances). Usage is recorded team appearances divided by twice the report battle count; win rate is wins divided by wins plus losses for teams containing this Pokemon. Neither metric measures individual strength. Small samples can produce extreme percentages.

Usage Trends

Usage was 19.34% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=74,640 team slots) and 20.17% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST; n=74,640 team slots), a change of +0.83 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded. Win rate was 52.33% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=14,432 recorded appearances) and 52.59% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:05 JST; n=15,055 recorded appearances), a change of +0.26 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded.

Rating-band Observations

Across 5 available rating bands, usage ranged from 17.45% (~R1084; n=60,196 team slots) to 21.45% (~R1268; n=59,484 team slots), a spread of 4.00 percentage points. Overall usage was 19.88%. Bands use battle-average ratings, not individual player skill. Missing bands are excluded; differences are descriptive, not evidence of statistical significance.

Recorded Moves

Among the returned moves, Sucker Punch has the largest recorded team-use count (18,726; ties may occur). Move counts refer to distinct team appearances with a recorded use by this Pokemon, counting each side once per battle. The displayed percentage divides that count by this Pokemon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same report filters. Both sides of a mirror battle count separately. This is not moveset adoption. Unused moves and missing move records cannot be distinguished here. These data do not establish which move is strongest or underused.

Teammate Observations

In the returned frequent-teammate sample: Great Tusk: 52.8% wins in 22,593 recorded pair observations; Ogerpon-Wellspring: 53.9% wins in 14,041 recorded pair observations; Gholdengo: 52.0% wins in 13,158 recorded pair observations. These are team-level outcomes with both Pokemon on the roster, not a measurement of synergy. Other teammates, player selection and small samples can affect these percentages.

Opponent-team Observations

Returned higher-win-rate opponent group: Metagross: 61.8% wins in 801 recorded pair observations; Incineroar: 61.5% wins in 615 recorded pair observations; Milotic: 60.1% wins in 655 recorded pair observations. Returned lower-win-rate opponent group: Manaphy: 46.4% wins in 657 recorded pair observations; Indeedee: 46.6% wins in 814 recorded pair observations; Hawlucha: 46.7% wins in 1,521 recorded pair observations. Wins refer to the team containing the focal Pokemon when the named Pokemon was on the opposing roster. They are not direct one-on-one results or proof of a counter; sample sizes and other team members matter.

Interpretation Limits

These summaries describe the collected battles within the report period. Team composition, player selection, repeated players and incomplete records can affect results. Differences do not establish causation, statistical significance or a recommended build.

The groups below summarize recorded team outcomes. Partner and opponent win rates do not measure synergy or direct one-on-one matchups. Small samples and other team members can affect results.

Frequent Partners

Most common teammates · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk22593 recorded pair observations · 15.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.8%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring14041 recorded pair observations · 9.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.9%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo13158 recorded pair observations · 8.81 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.0%
Dragapult
Dragapult13083 recorded pair observations · 8.76 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.6%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant12569 recorded pair observations · 8.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.1%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar10011 recorded pair observations · 6.71 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.7%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt8746 recorded pair observations · 5.86 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.1%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian8728 recorded pair observations · 5.85 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.2%
Kyurem
Kyurem8658 recorded pair observations · 5.80 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.5%
Dragonite
Dragonite7645 recorded pair observations · 5.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.9%
Gliscor
Gliscor7523 recorded pair observations · 5.04 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.0%
Cinderace
Cinderace7521 recorded pair observations · 5.04 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.4%
Glimmora
Glimmora7246 recorded pair observations · 4.85 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.5%
Hatterene
Hatterene7013 recorded pair observations · 4.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*6808 recorded pair observations · 4.56 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.2%
Iron Moth
Iron Moth5439 recorded pair observations · 3.64 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.0%
Iron Treads
Iron Treads5234 recorded pair observations · 3.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.1%
Ceruledge
Ceruledge4301 recorded pair observations · 2.88 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.1%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui4202 recorded pair observations · 2.81 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.3%
Corviknight
Corviknight4152 recorded pair observations · 2.78 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.7%

Frequent Matchups

Most common opponents · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk16168 recorded pair observations · 10.83 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.8%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo12341 recorded pair observations · 8.27 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.9%
Kingambit
Kingambit12032 recorded pair observations · 8.06 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.0%
Dragonite
Dragonite8553 recorded pair observations · 5.73 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.8%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring8251 recorded pair observations · 5.53 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.4%
Dragapult
Dragapult8149 recorded pair observations · 5.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.1%
Gliscor
Gliscor8138 recorded pair observations · 5.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.1%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant8108 recorded pair observations · 5.43 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*8003 recorded pair observations · 5.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.4%
Corviknight
Corviknight7573 recorded pair observations · 5.07 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.1%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt6945 recorded pair observations · 4.65 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.3%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar6604 recorded pair observations · 4.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.4%
Hatterene
Hatterene6577 recorded pair observations · 4.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.1%
Cinderace
Cinderace6403 recorded pair observations · 4.29 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.2%
Alomomola
Alomomola6018 recorded pair observations · 4.03 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.8%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian5760 recorded pair observations · 3.86 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.2%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui5671 recorded pair observations · 3.80 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.8%
Kyurem
Kyurem5632 recorded pair observations · 3.77 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.9%
Iron Treads
Iron Treads5498 recorded pair observations · 3.68 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.2%
Glimmora
Glimmora5377 recorded pair observations · 3.60 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.3%

Higher Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Moltres-Galar
Moltres-Galar598 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
61.0%
Overqwil
Overqwil701 recorded pair observations · 0.47 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.8%
Cresselia
Cresselia1936 recorded pair observations · 1.30 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.2%
Iron Moth
Iron Moth5439 recorded pair observations · 3.64 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.0%
Enamorus
Enamorus2471 recorded pair observations · 1.66 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.3%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui4202 recorded pair observations · 2.81 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.3%
Araquanid
Araquanid1607 recorded pair observations · 1.08 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.2%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*6808 recorded pair observations · 4.56 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.2%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt8746 recorded pair observations · 5.86 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.1%
Ogerpon-Cornerstone
Ogerpon-Cornerstone676 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.9%

Lower Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Clodsire
Clodsire627 recorded pair observations · 0.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.0%
Quaquaval
Quaquaval713 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.3%
Dondozo
Dondozo1228 recorded pair observations · 0.82 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.4%
Mimikyu
Mimikyu680 recorded pair observations · 0.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.9%
Greninja-*
Greninja-*1066 recorded pair observations · 0.71 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.8%
Gliscor
Gliscor7523 recorded pair observations · 5.04 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.0%
Rotom-Wash
Rotom-Wash1525 recorded pair observations · 1.02 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.1%
Scizor
Scizor718 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.3%
Maushold
Maushold2231 recorded pair observations · 1.49 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.5%
Toxapex
Toxapex1107 recorded pair observations · 0.74 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.5%

Higher Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Metagross
Metagross801 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
61.8%
Incineroar
Incineroar615 recorded pair observations · 0.41 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
61.5%
Milotic
Milotic655 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
60.1%
Gyarados
Gyarados657 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
59.2%
Cloyster
Cloyster761 recorded pair observations · 0.51 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.3%
Zoroark-Hisui
Zoroark-Hisui806 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.7%
Greninja-*
Greninja-*1606 recorded pair observations · 1.08 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.4%
Regieleki
Regieleki731 recorded pair observations · 0.49 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.3%
Grimmsnarl
Grimmsnarl1017 recorded pair observations · 0.68 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.8%
Polteageist
Polteageist669 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.6%

Lower Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Manaphy
Manaphy657 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.4%
Indeedee
Indeedee814 recorded pair observations · 0.55 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.6%
Hawlucha
Hawlucha1521 recorded pair observations · 1.02 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.7%
Slither Wing
Slither Wing873 recorded pair observations · 0.58 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.1%
Keldeo-Resolute
Keldeo-Resolute600 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.3%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt6945 recorded pair observations · 4.65 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.3%
Moltres-Galar
Moltres-Galar663 recorded pair observations · 0.44 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.4%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*8003 recorded pair observations · 5.36 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.4%
Iron Crown
Iron Crown2264 recorded pair observations · 1.52 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.6%
Iron Moth
Iron Moth4432 recorded pair observations · 2.97 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.1%