Last Updated: 10/10/2026 14:14 [UTC]

Weavile

Tier D

OU (Over Used)

2.60%Usage Rate
49.12%Win Rate
20.70%Lead Rate
1248Avg Rating

7754 recorded team appearances · 3809 wins · 3945 losses · 09/26/2026–10/10/2026

Recorded Move Team Uses

Top 10 moves with 10+ recorded team uses

Knock Off Recorded use in 2491 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (32.1%) 1275 winning team uses of 2491 recorded team uses
51.2%
Triple Axel Recorded use in 1862 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (24.0%) 909 winning team uses of 1862 recorded team uses
48.8%
Ice Shard Recorded use in 1305 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (16.8%) 680 winning team uses of 1305 recorded team uses
52.1%
Swords Dance Recorded use in 877 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (11.3%) 395 winning team uses of 877 recorded team uses
45.0%
Icicle Crash Recorded use in 490 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (6.3%) 231 winning team uses of 490 recorded team uses
47.1%
Low Kick Recorded use in 434 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (5.6%) 226 winning team uses of 434 recorded team uses
52.1%
Fake Out Recorded use in 349 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (4.5%) 123 winning team uses of 349 recorded team uses
35.2%
Ice Spinner Recorded use in 140 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (1.8%) 59 winning team uses of 140 recorded team uses
42.1%
Beat Up Recorded use in 96 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (1.2%) 45 winning team uses of 96 recorded team uses
46.9%
Brick Break Recorded use in 96 of 7754 distinct recorded team appearances (1.2%) 36 winning team uses of 96 recorded team uses
37.5%

Team win rate among recorded uses · bars centered at 50%

⚠️ Important Note:

  • This data shows moves actually recorded as used in battles, not move adoption rates in team building.
  • Each side counts once per battle for this Pokémon and move, even after repeated uses or duplicate saved records. Both teams in a mirror battle count separately.
  • The use proportion divides recorded team uses by this Pokémon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same period, format, rating and OTS filters. Win rate divides winning team uses by recorded team uses.
  • Unused moves, unselected Pokémon and missing or misattributed move records limit comparisons. Name and form resolution may omit or mix move records. No records do not imply a 0% win rate.
  • These team outcomes do not show that a move increases the chance of winning.
  • For moveset adoption rates, refer to Smogon Stats.

Usage Trend

Win Rate Trend

Usage by rating

Win rate by rating

Chart data
Trends
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST 2.77 48.55 74642 2068 Observed
Period 2: 2026/09/30 15:46–2026/10/03 23:49 JST 2.77 48.96 74642 2071 Observed
Period 3: 2026/10/03 23:49–2026/10/07 09:55 JST 2.51 49.17 74640 1875 Observed
Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST 2.33 49.94 74640 1740 Observed
Rating bands
Period / bandUsage %Win %Team slotsRecorded appearances with win/lossStatus
~R1084 2.42 49.83 60200 1455 Observed
~R1156 2.62 48.23 59416 1557 Observed
~R1268 2.57 49.21 59484 1526 Observed
~R1398 2.92 49.66 59960 1748 Observed
R1398~ 2.47 48.64 59504 1468 Observed

Weavile Observed Statistics

Performance Metrics

Weavile has a reported usage rate of 2.60% and win rate of 49.12% in OU (Over Used) (displayed tier: D). The report covers 09/26/2026 to 10/10/2026, with 149,282 recorded battles. 3,809 wins and 3,945 losses (7,754 recorded team appearances). Usage is recorded team appearances divided by twice the report battle count; win rate is wins divided by wins plus losses for teams containing this Pokemon. Neither metric measures individual strength. Small samples can produce extreme percentages.

Usage Trends

Usage was 2.77% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=74,642 team slots) and 2.33% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST; n=74,640 team slots), a change of -0.44 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded. Win rate was 48.55% in the first available period (Period 1: 2026/09/26 23:07–2026/09/30 15:45 JST; n=2,068 recorded appearances) and 49.94% in the last available period (Period 4: 2026/10/07 09:55–2026/10/10 23:06 JST; n=1,740 recorded appearances), a change of +1.39 percentage points. This endpoint comparison does not describe every intervening period or explain the cause; small samples can fluctuate substantially. Periods without sample counts are excluded.

Rating-band Observations

Across 5 available rating bands, usage ranged from 2.42% (~R1084; n=60,200 team slots) to 2.92% (~R1398; n=59,960 team slots), a spread of 0.50 percentage points. Overall usage was 2.60%. Bands use battle-average ratings, not individual player skill. Missing bands are excluded; differences are descriptive, not evidence of statistical significance.

Recorded Moves

Among the returned moves, Knock Off has the largest recorded team-use count (2,491; ties may occur). Move counts refer to distinct team appearances with a recorded use by this Pokemon, counting each side once per battle. The displayed percentage divides that count by this Pokemon's distinct recorded team appearances under the same report filters. Both sides of a mirror battle count separately. This is not moveset adoption. Unused moves and missing move records cannot be distinguished here. These data do not establish which move is strongest or underused.

Teammate Observations

In the returned frequent-teammate sample: Dragonite: 52.1% wins in 1,781 recorded pair observations; Gliscor: 48.9% wins in 1,614 recorded pair observations; Great Tusk: 50.5% wins in 1,591 recorded pair observations. These are team-level outcomes with both Pokemon on the roster, not a measurement of synergy. Other teammates, player selection and small samples can affect these percentages.

Opponent-team Observations

Returned higher-win-rate opponent group: Maushold: 57.3% wins in 164 recorded pair observations; Greninja-*: 56.5% wins in 214 recorded pair observations; Garchomp: 53.9% wins in 419 recorded pair observations. Returned lower-win-rate opponent group: Cresselia: 41.3% wins in 201 recorded pair observations; Skeledirge: 41.6% wins in 149 recorded pair observations; Moltres: 42.4% wins in 394 recorded pair observations. Wins refer to the team containing the focal Pokemon when the named Pokemon was on the opposing roster. They are not direct one-on-one results or proof of a counter; sample sizes and other team members matter.

Interpretation Limits

These summaries describe the collected battles within the report period. Team composition, player selection, repeated players and incomplete records can affect results. Differences do not establish causation, statistical significance or a recommended build.

The groups below summarize recorded team outcomes. Partner and opponent win rates do not measure synergy or direct one-on-one matchups. Small samples and other team members can affect results.

Frequent Partners

Most common teammates · bars centered at 50%

Dragonite
Dragonite1781 recorded pair observations · 1.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.1%
Gliscor
Gliscor1614 recorded pair observations · 1.08 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.9%
Great Tusk
Great Tusk1591 recorded pair observations · 1.07 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.5%
Corviknight
Corviknight1470 recorded pair observations · 0.98 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.6%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo1150 recorded pair observations · 0.77 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.6%
Clefable
Clefable981 recorded pair observations · 0.66 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Hatterene
Hatterene882 recorded pair observations · 0.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.0%
Alomomola
Alomomola849 recorded pair observations · 0.57 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.4%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar818 recorded pair observations · 0.55 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.4%
Pecharunt
Pecharunt799 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.6%
Garchomp
Garchomp691 recorded pair observations · 0.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.8%
Ting-Lu
Ting-Lu672 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.8%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring637 recorded pair observations · 0.43 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.1%
Cinderace
Cinderace625 recorded pair observations · 0.42 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.8%
Dragapult
Dragapult602 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian596 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
51.3%
Glimmora
Glimmora579 recorded pair observations · 0.39 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.0%
Rillaboom
Rillaboom578 recorded pair observations · 0.39 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.1%
Kingambit
Kingambit557 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
49.0%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant556 recorded pair observations · 0.37 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.7%

Frequent Matchups

Most common opponents · bars centered at 50%

Great Tusk
Great Tusk2071 recorded pair observations · 1.39 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.8%
Gholdengo
Gholdengo1628 recorded pair observations · 1.09 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.2%
Kingambit
Kingambit1531 recorded pair observations · 1.03 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.1%
Dragonite
Dragonite1161 recorded pair observations · 0.78 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.0%
Ogerpon-Wellspring
Ogerpon-Wellspring1131 recorded pair observations · 0.76 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.7%
Dragapult
Dragapult1090 recorded pair observations · 0.73 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.4%
Iron Valiant
Iron Valiant1052 recorded pair observations · 0.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.0%
Gliscor
Gliscor1039 recorded pair observations · 0.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
50.2%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*1038 recorded pair observations · 0.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.0%
Corviknight
Corviknight990 recorded pair observations · 0.66 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
48.3%
Raging Bolt
Raging Bolt878 recorded pair observations · 0.59 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.8%
Slowking-Galar
Slowking-Galar872 recorded pair observations · 0.58 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.8%
Alomomola
Alomomola804 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.3%
Hatterene
Hatterene800 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.5%
Cinderace
Cinderace795 recorded pair observations · 0.53 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
47.8%
Landorus-Therian
Landorus-Therian791 recorded pair observations · 0.53 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.0%
Samurott-Hisui
Samurott-Hisui740 recorded pair observations · 0.50 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.0%
Iron Treads
Iron Treads719 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Kyurem
Kyurem685 recorded pair observations · 0.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.1%
Ting-Lu
Ting-Lu670 recorded pair observations · 0.45 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.3%

Higher Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Araquanid
Araquanid191 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
58.6%
Chesnaught
Chesnaught180 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.2%
Bronzong
Bronzong161 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.9%
Volcanion
Volcanion199 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.8%
Sinistcha
Sinistcha293 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
55.6%
Ogerpon
Ogerpon237 recorded pair observations · 0.16 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.9%
Pecharunt
Pecharunt799 recorded pair observations · 0.54 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.6%
Slither Wing
Slither Wing493 recorded pair observations · 0.33 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.2%
Skeledirge
Skeledirge246 recorded pair observations · 0.16 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
54.1%
Excadrill
Excadrill240 recorded pair observations · 0.16 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.8%

Lower Win-rate Partners

Returned teammates below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Gengar
Gengar197 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
38.6%
Lucario
Lucario185 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
39.5%
Polteageist
Polteageist153 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.2%
Toxapex
Toxapex198 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.4%
Dragapult
Dragapult602 recorded pair observations · 0.40 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Metagross
Metagross315 recorded pair observations · 0.21 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.4%
Greninja-*
Greninja-*151 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.0%
Meowscarada
Meowscarada155 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.2%
Deoxys-Speed
Deoxys-Speed152 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.0%
Serperior
Serperior193 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
46.1%

Higher Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents above the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Maushold
Maushold164 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
57.3%
Greninja-*
Greninja-*214 recorded pair observations · 0.14 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
56.5%
Garchomp
Garchomp419 recorded pair observations · 0.28 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.9%
Venusaur
Venusaur163 recorded pair observations · 0.11 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.4%
Excadrill
Excadrill209 recorded pair observations · 0.14 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.1%
Tyranitar
Tyranitar273 recorded pair observations · 0.18 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
53.1%
Heatran
Heatran300 recorded pair observations · 0.20 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.7%
Hawlucha
Hawlucha190 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.6%
Hydrapple
Hydrapple181 recorded pair observations · 0.12 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.5%
Clefable
Clefable453 recorded pair observations · 0.30 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
52.3%

Lower Win-rate Opponent Teams

Returned opponents below the focal Pokemon's overall win rate · bars centered at 50%

Cresselia
Cresselia201 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.3%
Skeledirge
Skeledirge149 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
41.6%
Moltres
Moltres394 recorded pair observations · 0.26 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
42.4%
Volcanion
Volcanion146 recorded pair observations · 0.10 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.1%
Tornadus-Therian
Tornadus-Therian268 recorded pair observations · 0.18 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
43.3%
Zamazenta-*
Zamazenta-*1038 recorded pair observations · 0.70 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.0%
Kyurem
Kyurem685 recorded pair observations · 0.46 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.1%
Iron Treads
Iron Treads719 recorded pair observations · 0.48 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
44.2%
Iron Crown
Iron Crown289 recorded pair observations · 0.19 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.0%
Ninetales-Alola
Ninetales-Alola188 recorded pair observations · 0.13 pair observations per 100 analyzed battles
45.2%